Attorneys for New York City Mayor Eric Adams asked a U.S. judge to dismiss with prejudice all charges against their client on Wednesday, citing alleged prosecutorial misconduct and an “extraordinary” flurry of leaks that they argued would have violated Adams’ right to a fair trial.
The filing comes nearly two weeks after the Justice Department filed a motion to dismiss the corruption case against Adams, and after the presiding judge in the case, U.S. District Judge Dale Ho, declined to immediately grant the request to do so.
In the new filing, Adams’ legal team asked Judge Ho to grant the Justice Department‘s request to drop charges swiftly and prejudice, arguing that the actions by prosecutors had violated multiple statutory and court rules, including long-established Justice Department policies aimed at curbing prosecutorial misconduct.
They also cited the “extraordinary” amount of leaked information from prosecutors that they argued would have violated Adams’ right to a fair trial; noting in particular a Feb. 12 resignation letter by former acting U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, which lawyers said would have “destroyed whatever presumption of innocence Mayor Adams had left.”
TRUMP STRIPS SECURITY CLEARANCES FROM LAW FIRM TIED TO JACK SMITH CASES
Attorneys for New York City Mayor Eric Adams asked a judge to dismiss his corruption charges with prejudice. (Adam Gray for Fox News Digital )
“In addition to violating Mayor Adams’s fundamental constitutional rights and ability to receive a fair trial, the government’s leaks violated numerous statutory and court rules, including the Justice Department’s own longstanding policies aimed at curbing prosecutorial misconduct,” they argued in the filing.
The charges against Adams will remain intact until Judge Ho agrees to dismiss them.
Adams was indicted last fall on five federal corruption and bribery charges tied to the alleged solicitation of illegal campaign contributions and the alleged receiving of luxury travel perks on behalf of Turkish foreign nationals, according to Justice Department documents.
Adams pleaded not guilty to all charges and has strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
DEMOCRAT REP RITCHIE TORRES ENDORSES CUOMO FOR NEW YORK CITY MAYOR OVER ERIC ADAMS: REPORT
Hagan Scotten, assistant U.S. attorney, Alex Spiro, attorney for New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and Adams attend a court appearance in federal court after Adams was charged with bribery and illegally soliciting a campaign contribution from a foreign national, in New York City Oct. 2, 2024 in this courtroom sketch. (REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg)
U.S. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove asked federal prosecutors earlier this month to drop all corruption charges against the mayor— an unusual move, and one that requires the formal sign-off of the presiding judge in the case.
In the motion to dismiss, Bove said the legal proceedings against Adams were detracting from other Justice Department priorities, such as illegal immigration and violent crime.
However, Judge Ho declined to immediately grant the motion to dismiss at a court hearing last week, telling Bove and Adams’ legal team that he needed more time to further consider the facts.
Ho also appointed former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement to argue against the motion to dismiss and to look into the Justice Department’s motives for dismissing the charges.
President Donald Trump, left, wished New York City Mayor Eric Adams luck in his fight against the Justice Department. (ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images | Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)
He has instructed legal briefs to be filed on March 7 and, if necessary, said there would be a hearing on March 14.
“This is a very complicated situation, at least from where I sit,” Ho said after the roughly 90-minute hearing last week, adding, “I’m not going to shoot from the hip right here on the bench.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Not dropping the charges against Adams is highly unusual, and no U.S. appellate court has ever sided with a federal judge who declined to grant an unopposed motion to dismiss.
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on its view of the new filing and if it agreed with the assertion that the case against Adams should be dismissed with prejudice.